EATING, DRINKING, SMOKING -
comparative price levels in 37 European countries for 2006
The results presented in this article refer to the survey on Food, Beverages and Tobacco carried out in spring 2006 in the 37 participating countries co-ordinated by Eurostat: the 27 EU Member States, the 3 Candidate Countries, Croatia, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Turkey, the 3 EFTA countries, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland and the 4 West Balkan countries, Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia. This survey covered a total of approximately 500 comparable products, enabling all countries to price a sufficient number of products representative of their consumption pattern.
What are Price level indices?
The indicators analysed in this article are Price level indices (PLIs), calculated as the ratio between Purchasing Power Parities (PPPs) and exchange rates for each country, in relation to the EU average.
These indices provide a comparison of the countries' price levels with respect to the European Union average: if the price level index is higher than 100, the country concerned is relatively expensive compared to the EU average and vice versa. Price level indices are not intended to rank countries strictly. In fact, they only provide an indication of the comparative order of magnitude of the price level in one country in relation to others, particularly when countries are clustered around a very narrow range of outcomes.
It should also be noted that the PLIs in this article have been calculated using 2006 price data, however, estimated expenditure data had to be applied, as expenditure data for 2006 will only become available in autumn this year. The PLIs may therefore change slightly when the preliminary PPP data 2006 are published in December 2007, based on 2006 expenditure data.
Food, Beverages and Tobacco: Price level indices for 2006 -
a comparison between EU, EFTA and EU Candidate Countries
Price level indices for 2006 are presented in Chart 1 and Graph 1 for food and non-alcoholic beverages. The following country groups can be distinguished:
- Group I (
130% of the EU average): Denmark, Iceland, Norway and Switzerland;
- Group II (
100% and <130% of the EU average): Belgium, Germany, France, Ireland, Italy, Cyprus, Luxembourg, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom;
- Group III (
80% and <100% of the EU average): Greece, Spain, Malta, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Croatia and Turkey;
- Group IV (≥
60% and <80% of the EU average): the Czech Republic, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Poland, Romania, Slovakia, Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegro and Serbia;
- Group V (<60% of the EU average): Bulgaria and FYROM.
Chart 1 shows that disparities in the price level index between the EU countries are remarkable and lie between 56 (Bulgaria) and 142 (Denmark), alcohol and tobacco excluded.
This means that a comparable basket of food and non-alcoholic beverages in the most expensive EU country, Denmark, costs more than 2.5 times as much as in the least expensive country, Bulgaria. Moreover, the distribution generally tends to reflect a geographical element with eastern EU countries below the EU average.
The three EFTA countries appear to be among the most expensive in the survey group: prices in Iceland (164) and Norway (158) in particular are significantly higher than in Denmark (142). Switzerland has a comparable price level to Denmark.
Finally, the candidate countries, Croatia (89) and Turkey (84), have PLIs approaching those of the EU Member States average while FYROM (56) shows - together with Bulgaria - the lowest PLI of all countries compared.
Chart 2 and Chart 3 show PLIs for alcohol and tobacco. We observe that disparities in the PLIs for these products between the EU countries are remarkable. They lie between 69 (Bulgaria) and 181 (Ireland) for alcohol and between 28 (Latvia) and 205 (United Kingdom) for tobacco. This signifies that smoking costs about 7 times as much in the UK as in Latvia. Looking at the ECP countries outside the EU, price dispersion is even higher, ranging from 65 (FYROM) to 229 (Norway) in the case of alcohol and from 24 (Montenegro) to 227 (Norway) for tobacco. In Turkey, alcohol is also very expensive, showing a PLI of 176, whereas tobacco is relatively cheap with a PLI level of 56.
Table 1: 2006 Comparative price level indices for the main sub-groups of the survey, EU27=100
| |
Overall survey |
Food and non-alcoholic beverages |
Food |
Bread and cereals |
Meat |
Fish |
Milk, cheese and eggs |
Oils and fats |
Fruits and vegetables |
Other food |
Non-alcoholic beverages |
Alcoholic beverages |
Tobacco |
| BE |
107 |
110 |
111 |
109 |
123 |
128 |
109 |
111 |
105 |
100 |
101 |
97 |
100 |
| BG |
56 |
56 |
55 |
41 |
48 |
62 |
82 |
95 |
50 |
67 |
73 |
69 |
51 |
| CZ |
68 |
69 |
68 |
61 |
60 |
76 |
80 |
83 |
64 |
83 |
82 |
86 |
52 |
| DK |
136 |
142 |
139 |
150 |
149 |
138 |
116 |
135 |
129 |
161 |
170 |
128 |
115 |
| DE |
104 |
105 |
106 |
108 |
118 |
121 |
87 |
88 |
116 |
99 |
103 |
82 |
119 |
| EE |
72 |
75 |
74 |
70 |
64 |
73 |
79 |
88 |
83 |
83 |
90 |
89 |
41 |
| IE |
140 |
125 |
124 |
121 |
129 |
123 |
126 |
98 |
130 |
121 |
135 |
181 |
186 |
| EL |
95 |
98 |
97 |
95 |
91 |
101 |
138 |
118 |
73 |
114 |
118 |
109 |
73 |
| ES |
87 |
92 |
93 |
112 |
81 |
89 |
96 |
89 |
95 |
100 |
87 |
81 |
64 |
| FR |
106 |
105 |
107 |
103 |
122 |
106 |
100 |
107 |
108 |
98 |
83 |
91 |
133 |
| IT |
112 |
115 |
116 |
109 |
118 |
122 |
126 |
113 |
115 |
116 |
109 |
113 |
99 |
| CY |
106 |
107 |
104 |
108 |
81 |
142 |
139 |
134 |
90 |
127 |
142 |
118 |
95 |
| LV |
65 |
69 |
68 |
59 |
58 |
71 |
75 |
95 |
73 |
82 |
89 |
92 |
28 |
| LT |
62 |
64 |
63 |
61 |
50 |
57 |
75 |
91 |
68 |
76 |
79 |
79 |
30 |
| LU |
104 |
115 |
116 |
119 |
120 |
110 |
112 |
112 |
131 |
106 |
104 |
88 |
84 |
| HU |
69 |
71 |
70 |
60 |
65 |
75 |
83 |
90 |
65 |
82 |
77 |
77 |
54 |
| MT |
86 |
83 |
81 |
76 |
69 |
82 |
111 |
98 |
70 |
101 |
108 |
117 |
84 |
| NL |
90 |
88 |
89 |
89 |
105 |
115 |
78 |
66 |
89 |
80 |
83 |
93 |
103 |
| AT |
105 |
110 |
111 |
126 |
121 |
111 |
98 |
115 |
107 |
107 |
97 |
81 |
98 |
| PL |
66 |
67 |
65 |
60 |
52 |
67 |
67 |
83 |
72 |
82 |
84 |
91 |
44 |
| PT |
87 |
88 |
87 |
95 |
82 |
70 |
105 |
98 |
80 |
109 |
93 |
99 |
76 |
| RO |
68 |
71 |
70 |
59 |
60 |
85 |
94 |
95 |
70 |
87 |
88 |
88 |
32 |
| SI |
82 |
86 |
86 |
93 |
83 |
102 |
83 |
106 |
79 |
94 |
88 |
86 |
59 |
| SK |
65 |
67 |
66 |
56 |
58 |
68 |
75 |
100 |
63 |
87 |
77 |
72 |
51 |
| FI |
124 |
120 |
119 |
141 |
119 |
111 |
110 |
118 |
124 |
113 |
132 |
170 |
107 |
| SE |
121 |
119 |
119 |
131 |
133 |
109 |
104 |
118 |
123 |
114 |
118 |
145 |
119 |
| UK |
128 |
113 |
113 |
103 |
126 |
91 |
115 |
104 |
120 |
107 |
121 |
152 |
205 |
| HR |
87 |
89 |
87 |
87 |
86 |
84 |
89 |
103 |
78 |
107 |
107 |
113 |
65 |
| MK |
53 |
56 |
55 |
55 |
53 |
64 |
62 |
80 |
43 |
72 |
67 |
65 |
31 |
| TR |
85 |
84 |
83 |
70 |
77 |
76 |
117 |
93 |
71 |
107 |
101 |
176 |
56 |
| IS |
170 |
164 |
163 |
188 |
189 |
112 |
149 |
139 |
154 |
160 |
176 |
226 |
173 |
| NO |
172 |
158 |
159 |
164 |
182 |
128 |
160 |
156 |
143 |
163 |
159 |
229 |
227 |
| CH |
129 |
142 |
146 |
142 |
195 |
142 |
126 |
163 |
131 |
129 |
104 |
96 |
102 |
| AL |
68 |
72 |
70 |
59 |
62 |
85 |
84 |
95 |
61 |
102 |
98 |
96 |
33 |
| BA |
65 |
71 |
70 |
62 |
73 |
65 |
76 |
86 |
62 |
83 |
89 |
78 |
32 |
| ME |
67 |
74 |
74 |
66 |
69 |
70 |
77 |
84 |
80 |
87 |
77 |
76 |
24 |
| RS |
62 |
67 |
67 |
56 |
68 |
82 |
75 |
98 |
59 |
80 |
72 |
73 |
26 |
How to read table 1?
The prices underlying this table are average annual national prices for the respective product groups. In the columns, the table provides a direct comparison of the price levels for the respective product group across all 37 participating countries. For example, the PLI for oils and fats is 4% above the EU average in UK and 18% above the EU average in Sweden. Oils and fats are, therefore, in Sweden about 14% more expensive than in the UK (118/104=1.14).
By row, the table refers to the PLIs of different product groups within one country and the interpretation is the following one. All PLIs are expressed relative to the EU average for the respective product groups. For example, for Fish the Portuguese price level is 30% below the EU average and for milk, cheese and eggs 5% above the EU average. In relation to the respective EU averages, therefore, Fish is relatively cheaper in Portugal than milk, cheese and eggs.
Table 1 shows for all participating countries the comparative PLIs for the main sub-groups of products making up the total survey.
Let's look at Luxembourg as an example for cross border comparisons. Luxembourg has borders with Belgium, France and Germany. It is at about the same price level as Belgium and Germany and France, when it comes to food, beverages and tobacco in total. Looking at individual product groups, the picture is different. According to Table 1, Luxembourgers would gain financially by buying bread and cereals in France, fruits and vegetables in Belgium and milk, cheese and eggs in Germany. For non-alcoholic beverages France (83) has clearly a lower price level than Luxembourg (104) and the two other countries. Also for fish France has the lowest price level of the four countries. A remarkable price level difference again exists for tobacco, Luxembourg (84) being the cheapest of the four by some way. In France (133) tobacco products are 58% more expensive than in Luxembourg, in Germany (119) 42% and in Belgium (100) 19%, respectively.
Similarly, we can look at the Czech Republic and Slovakia. At the overall survey level price levels are very close to each other and also in many product groups. At the same time, the respective populations would gain for example by buying oils and fats from the Czech Republic and meat from Slovakia.
Concerning the Netherlands it's worthwhile to notice that at the time of the survey a "price war" was going on between some supermarket chains, resulting in relatively low consumer prices for several items.
Table 2: Coefficient of variation for EUR13, EU15, EU27 and
all 37 survey participants by product groups
| |
EUR13 |
EU15 |
EU27 |
EU37 |
| Overall
survey |
15.1 |
15 |
25.8 |
32.2 |
| Food |
12 |
12.3 |
24.3 |
29.9 |
| Bread
and cereals |
13 |
14.7 |
30.9 |
37.2 |
| Meat |
15.7 |
15.6 |
33.2 |
41 |
| Fish |
13.8 |
15 |
24.8 |
25.9 |
| Milk,
cheese and eggs |
16.2 |
13.9 |
20.1 |
24.1 |
| Oils
and fats |
13.9 |
15 |
15.2 |
19.8 |
| Fruits
and vegetables |
18.1 |
16.2 |
26.4 |
31.3 |
| Other
food |
10.1 |
15.3 |
19.2 |
22.7 |
| Non-alcoholic
beverages |
16 |
20.2 |
22.7 |
25.9 |
| Alcoholic
beverages |
29.8 |
28.3 |
28.1 |
37.8 |
| Tobacco |
32.1 |
33.6 |
50.4 |
61.1 |
Table 2 is based
on Table 1 and provides a coefficient of variation within the Euro-zone (EUR13),
the 15 "old" Member States (EU15), the European Union (EU27) and the group of
all 37 countries participating in the survey. The measure used is, for each
product group, the coefficient of variation, defined as the standard deviation
as percentage of the average PLIs of the respective group of countries. The
larger these numbers are the higher are price dispersions in the respective
countries and product groups.
The most striking feature of Table 2 is that the price dispersion is greatest for tobacco, in all country groups. Alcoholic beverages also have quite high price dispersion in different country groups. However, large price dispersion is no real surprise, as these products are subject to very different national regulations, excise duties and other taxes. The high price dispersion appears as, for example, Nordic countries and Turkey show PLIs for alcoholic beverages that are significantly higher than those of all other countries (see Table 1).
For tobacco products consumers have to pay in UK and Norway prices more than twice above the level of the EU average. In Latvia and Lithuania, on the other hand, such products are available at about 70 % below the average EU price level (see Table 1).
Price dispersion is naturally greatest within the 37-country group of the survey participants, involving at the same time the high price EFTA and the mostly low price Candidate Countries, relative to the EU.
Table 3: Price convergence for EU27: comparison between
2003 and 2006 by product groups
| |
EU27 |
| 2003 |
2006 |
%-change |
| Food |
29.2 |
24.3 |
-16.80% |
| Bread
and cereals |
35.2 |
30.9 |
-12.10% |
| Meat |
36.5 |
33.2 |
-9.10% |
| Fish |
27 |
24.8 |
-8.10% |
| Milk,
cheese and eggs |
22.2 |
20.1 |
-9.40% |
| Oils
and fats |
18.1 |
15.2 |
-16.20% |
| Fruits
and vegetables |
32.1 |
26.4 |
-17.60% |
| Other
food |
24.9 |
19.2 |
-22.90% |
| Non-alcoholic
beverages |
25.3 |
22.7 |
-10.20% |
| Alcoholic beverages |
32.6 |
28.1 |
-13.50% |
| Tobacco |
54.1 |
50.4 |
-6.80% |
Table 3 shows a comparison of the coefficients of variation between the 2003 and 2006 surveys on food, beverages and tobacco. A decrease of the coefficient of variation is an indication of price convergence for the respective product group.
The most obvious result from the 2003 - 2006 comparison is a general convergence of prices among the 27 Member States. We observe a strong convergence especially for oils and fats, fruits and vegetables, other food and alcoholic beverages.
How are consumer price surveys organised?
For the purposes of the collection of consumer prices, the 37 countries currently participating in the group co-ordinated by Eurostat, are divided in four groups that are organised as follows:
- the Northern group is composed of Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland (Group leader), Iceland, Ireland, Latvia, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Sweden, UK;
- the Central group is composed of Austria (Group leader), Croatia, Czech Republic, Germany, FYROM, Hungary, Luxembourg, Poland, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Switzerland;
- the Southern group is composed of Bulgaria, Cyprus, France, Greece, Italy, Portugal(Group leader), Romania, Spain, Malta, and Turkey;
- the Western Balkan group, composed of Albania, Bosnia-Herzegovina and Serbia-Montenegro, and logistically attached to the Central Group with Slovenia playing the role of Group leader.
The idea behind this approach is to combine countries in a group, which have similar market structures and consumption pattern due to their similar geographical location. Consequently, each group of countries has group-specific product lists. Specific meetings in all three groups and one so-called "overlap" meeting are organised in order to ensure:
- a harmonised approach to the survey concerned in all participating countries,
- the right balance between comparability of products selected for the survey and their representativity of the expenditure pattern in each participating country,
- and sufficient overlap between the three group product lists for the overall European comparison. A particularly difficult problem in this process is a sufficient overlap between participating countries, as the consumption pattern differs still substantially in many countries.
The four group leaders co-ordinate the establishment of the group product lists, including pre-survey work and validate the prices collected in their respective group. Eurostat is responsible for the overall European co-ordination and PPP calculation.
For practical and cost reasons, the consumer price surveys are organised in a rolling cycle over three years, and they are carried out in the countries' capital cities in a specific survey month. Subsequently, the prices are adjusted to annual average prices, using monthly consumer price indices of the survey year and to national average prices, using spatial adjustment factors. Between survey years, benchmark results are extrapolated using annual average CPI. The prices observed are the market prices consumers actually pay, including all taxes and duties.
Published on 07.06.2007